UTC Worship

UTC Worship
by Jeba Singh Samuel

Saturday 6 September 2014

Be a Non-Conformist in the Process of Peace Building in Church and Society (John 14:27-31)



Seven years ago, while I was working in a village, I used to go for a walk every morning and evening beside the agricultural fields; it was the season for sugarcane crop. One fine morning, I saw that sugarcane was ready for harvest and everyone’s face was filled with happiness; that same day evening I noticed a huge fire in the sugarcane field. When I went near to that place, I saw the entire field was scorched and became black. I was so sad and annoyed about the fire in the field, but later I came to know that it was the usual process after harvesting sugarcane. Five days later, when I was walking beside that field, I saw one green sprout, a sapling, coming out from the scorched field. This gave me a sense of joy and happiness. I realized that the sprout symbolizes the hope which appears amidst pain, agony and gloomy situations.
For the last two months, we have been witnessing and hearing about many issues such as wars at Gaza, Iraq, Syria, communal violence and sexual violence in the state and the nation. We could notice how innocent people became the victims of war, violence and abuse. At the same time, the perpetrators are justified by some ideologies. Wars are justified in the name of national security, which is also based upon the ideology of survival of life, not fullness of life for all. Similarly, the global market regime has penetrated every corner of the world causing injustice, impoverishment of people and destruction of life on earth. These realities disturb the peace of the common people. Because of such situations the innocent victims lose their hope; everything seems dark and gloomy for them.
In such a time as this, how do we respond to these catastrophes as Christian ministers? We tend to limit our response to just prayers. We are reluctant to confront these issues in reality and act to bring hope and peace in the lives of the innocent victims. The question here is, why as Christians, should we confront these issues? The answer can be found in the Bible, our Holy Scripture. All through the Bible, the promise of hope and peace is reflected in various forms and is expected to be carried forward to the people, especially to those who lost their hope in life.
The read pericope, John 14:27-31, is considered as one of the units of the final discourse of Jesus (Jn.14-16). Jesus explains about his relationship with God and his disciples in V.28, gives the caution of the ruler of this world in V.30, and tells about the disciples’ future which will help them to stand firm in their call and commitment. Here, Jesus not only talks about the strife and adversity, but also speaks, with confidence and knowledge, about the events of the future. Jesus promises to his disciples, the gift of peace, that he experienced in his life which was filled with rejection, humiliation and opposition. The gift of peace is also extended to us through the reconciliation act, the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ and thus drawing us near to God who is our peace (Jud.6:24). As Christians we are experiencing the reconciling act of God through Christ which gives peace and hope in our life. We are called and ought to be committed to build hope in the lives of innocent victims who are longing for peace in their struggles. We have the responsibility to share the blessings that we received from God.


In the following two points I wish to appropriate this to our contemporary situation:
Gift of Peace: A call for Building Peace in the World
The concept of peace is complex and difficult to define; scholars opine “when we search for peace we may not find it but only get a sense of peace”. So, building peace in the world is not a result oriented one, which will stop at a time of achieving it, but it is a continuous process; it needs lot of courage and strength. In Jn. 14:27, Jesus’ leaving peace and giving his peace to the disciples has a significant meaning in the process of building peace in this world. The next sentence is the climax of these two promises; that the peace which he offers is not like the peace this world offers. The worldly understanding of peace can be the absence of war or hostilities, but the peace which Jesus speaks about has nothing to do with such, but he promises his ever abiding presence with them even in the midst of their troubled heart and points them toward the life that they will lead after his hour. Jesus’ understanding of peace is based on the Hebrew word ‘shalom’ which means wholeness, completeness, health, security, sense of wellbeing, even blessing in the best sense which we see in the climax of the Aaronic Benediction in Num. 6:26. Shalom also includes everything given by God in all areas of life. The gift of peace also rests at the center of Israel’s eschatological hope which is mentioned in the prophetic books (Isa.9:6-7; 52:7; 57:19; Eze.37:26) and is now available in Jesus.
In the New Testament, the word εἰρήνη connotes wholeness and the sense of well-being, the source and giver of which is YHWH alone. But the basic meaning slightly differs from ‘Shalom’ especially through restoring relationships between God and humans and among humans, individually and corporately. The stressing of John’s Gospel on Christ’s gift of peace to his disciples and Christ’s missionary discourse, makes the point that his commissioned followers have to pass this gift of peace to others.
In this process one might have to face many difficulties, because of the prevalence of oppressive regimes that possess power and authority, both in church and in society which use varied strategies to silence the peacemakers by the acts of annihilation and some subtle methods. Being ministers in church and society, we are prone to this, sometimes we are expected or required to keep silent while the unjust acts shatter the peace of the marginalized and the innocent victims. In the words of the Brazilian Archbishop Dom Helder Camera – “when I feed the hungry,   they call me a saint. When I ask why they are poor, they call me a Communist.”
Bishop Duleep De Chickera, former Bishop of the Diocese of Colombo, Sri Lanka, says that historically oppressive regimes give birth to peacemakers who are faithful to their task. Jesus is the ideal example for this statement; Jesus, the messiah, was the hope, who was expected as a prince of peace in the time of exilic and post exilic period, when the oppressive regimes ruled over Israel and Judah as mentioned in the prophetic books. He lived in the time of Roman imperialism which also was an oppressive regime. Jesus came as a messiah, bringing peace to the humanity, especially to the oppressed, the suffering and the marginalized. He stood against the oppressive regime which exploited the poor and the needy.
We are also living in a different kind of imperialism and oppressive regime, called globalization, which pushes more people to the margins. There are innocent victims of war and disaster, hunger and poverty, political oppression and injustice, social violence and suppression, cultural desertification, communal riots in the name of religion and caste and the abuse of women and children. The charity the church does among the suffering and the innocent victims may not be enough. This situation challenges us to become peacemakers, to stand against the unjust dominant structures of the society and to bring about lasting peace. With the promise of Christ, we must find ways to achieve true peace, over against the global hegemonic military order and other sorts of violence in the society. When we start to work for building peace in the society, it automatically brings hope to the world. This is our divine responsibility which requires self-denial, towards servant leadership, in order to bring peace, justice and hope to the society.

Global Stewardship: A Counter Task to the Oppressive Regime
In Jn.14:31d, Jesus says to the disciples “Rise, let us be on our way.” This phrase is one of the most controversial among the fourth gospel scholarship because of the continuation of farewell discourse that continues till 17th chapter. Scholars opine that 14:31 was the original conclusion to the discourse and chapters 15-17 are later additions. Hoskyns and Dodd also see in the words a pause in the discourse rather than a change of scene. But the author of John’s Gospel has his own standards and he arranges his work to produce effects in his own way.
However, departing is a marking stage in the teaching; Jesus invites his disciples to arise and act along with Him. Jesus is the ideal model for global stewardship and he was faithful in his calling, so he fulfills the task which is given by God. He traversed the structural boundaries whenever it was required and did not limit himself. And we are also expected to get ourselves out of our comfort zones and move to the places where people need voices for their basic rights in this world, as Jesus did in his days of ministry.
The prevailing oppressive system is the root cause for all the injustice and unjust wars in this world. The counter task to the oppressive regime is global stewardship. The community of dignity and justice requires a voluntary abandonment of power and privilege, towards servant leadership from within the people. Self-denial is one of the basic qualifications for serving the humanity, especially in peace making. One not only has to deny him/herself, but he/she has to bear the cross.
In the process of peace building, Jesus is our role model; he never was convinced of or confirmed himself with the unjust social and religious structures of his time. As Disciples of Christ we have to stand as non-conformists who, at any cost, do not compromise ourselves in the process of peace building. In John 20:19-23, we see the risen Jesus appearing to the disciples who were afraid of the consequences of being the disciples of Jesus. So they tried to find peace and protection within a locked room. But Jesus tells them "Peace be with you." Then he says to them, "As the father has sent me, even so I send you." That means peace is not something that we experience within a locked room, keeping away from the violent world; rather peace is that which happens in our journey into the violent world, risking our life.
If we confirm ourselves within our rigid boundaries we cannot reach the margins where the peace of God is very much needed. The assurance of peace given by Jesus is not meant for enjoying the peace within ourselves or within our community. It should be carried beyond our own comfort zones. In the present scenario of the world, once again we are reminded to move out of our comfort zones, to the places where people need our voices, the good news of new hope and peace. When we work towards building peace in chaotic situations and in the lives of the victims, and witness their wellbeing, we can also realize and experience the gift of peace in our life, which was assured by our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
May the peace of our Lord Jesus Christ strengthen us and give us courage to be non- conformists in the process of peace building, to sprout up peace in the scorched gloomy lives of innocent victims.





C. P. Caroline
BD IV